4.7 Article

Investigation of COD and COD/N ratio for the dominance of anammox pathway for nitrogen removal via isotope labelling technique and the relevant bacteria

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 366, Issue -, Pages 606-614

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.12.036

Keywords

Anammox; Denitrification; COD; COD/N ratio; N-15 isotope labelling method

Funding

  1. Frontier Research Projects of IUE-CAS [IUEMS201404]
  2. China-Japanese Research Cooperative Program [2016YFE0118000]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51708536]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to investigate the importance of COD (chemical oxygen demand) and ratio of COD and nitrogen (COD/N) in influencing the dominance of anammox pathway to N-removal in anammox systems, which had been widely researched and results were not yet conclusive. Results showed that N-removal efficiency increased with increasing organic substrate, while the anammox contribution to N-removal decreased as confirmed by isotope labelling technique. Excessively high TN (total nitrogen) concentrations were detrimental to N-removal, and TN of 600 mg L-1 was optimized. Specific COD of 300 mg L-1 (a threshold value above which anammox was less active) was synergistic for N-removal. Moreover, Illumina sequencing and qPCR techniques uncovered that while the microbial community composition was relatively stable for all treatments, abundances of denitrifler were positively correlated with increase of COD, which was counter-productive for anammox abundance. Structure equation model indicated that COD was more important with respect to maintain the anammox stability than the COD/N ratio. Furthermore, experiment and model fittings revealed that anammox contributed more than 80% of N-removal when COD was below 55.7 mg L-1, and approximately 50% at 220-300 mg L-1 COD, respectively. These data formed a reference for regulation of anammox systems in real-world applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available