4.7 Article

Evaluation on the removal performance of dichloromethane and toluene from waste gases using an airlift packing reactor

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 366, Issue -, Pages 105-113

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.11.081

Keywords

Dichloromethane; Toluene; Airlift packing reactor; Microbial growth system; Microbial community

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFC0210904]
  2. National Key Technology R&D Program of China [2015BAD21B02]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51608475]
  4. Science and Technology Project of Zhejiang Province [2017C03007]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Biological removal of dichloromethane (DCM) from pharmaceutical industry is limited by its recalcitrance. In this study, an airlift packing reactor (ALPR), which combined the suspended and fixed-film microbial growth system, was set up to remove DCM and co-existed toluene. The removal performance of the ALPR for DCM was greater than traditional airlift reactor (ALR). The maximum elimination capacity (ECmax) of the ALPR for DCM reached 108 g m(-3) h(-1) with removal efficiency (RE) of 41%, increased by 145% if compared to the ALR. The ECmax for toluene was 172 g m(-3) h(-1) with RE of 70%, decreased by 25% if compared to the ALR, which was mainly due to the higher liquid-phase biomass in the ALR. The results of high-throughput sequencing showed that the microbial composition on the packings of the ALPR had a large difference from its liquid-phase or the liquid-phase of the ALR. Gemmobacter, Rhizomicrobium, Chitinophaga, Vampirovibrio, and Fodinicurvata were genera with great abundance fixed on the packings and Rhizomicrobium, Chitinophaga, Vampirovibrio, and Fodinicurvata are first to be reported in VOCs biological removal. This study indicated that the ALPR can augment the microbial community and effectively improve the removal of recalcitrant VOCs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available