Factors Affecting Adherence in a Pragmatic Trial of Annual Fecal Immunochemical Testing for Colorectal Cancer
Published 2019 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Factors Affecting Adherence in a Pragmatic Trial of Annual Fecal Immunochemical Testing for Colorectal Cancer
Authors
Keywords
colorectal, cancer, fecal immunochemical test, screening
Journal
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2019-01-26
DOI
10.1007/s11606-018-4820-0
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Patterns and predictors of repeat fecal immunochemical and occult blood test screening in four large health care systems in the United States
- (2018) Amit G. Singal et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
- Health Insurance Status and Clinical Cancer Screenings Among U.S. Adults
- (2018) Guixiang Zhao et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
- Long-term performance of colorectal cancer screening programmes based on the faecal immunochemical test
- (2017) Manuel Zorzi et al. GUT
- Changing socioeconomic inequalities in cancer incidence and mortality: Cohort study with 54 million person-years follow-up 1981-2011
- (2017) Andrea M. Teng et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
- Effect of Reminding Patients to Complete Fecal Immunochemical Testing: A Comparative Effectiveness Study of Automated and Live Approaches
- (2017) Gloria D. Coronado et al. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Cancer Screening Test Use — United States, 2015
- (2017) Arica White et al. MMWR-MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY WEEKLY REPORT
- Fecal Immunochemical Test Program Performance Over 4 Rounds of Annual Screening
- (2016) Christopher D. Jensen et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- A randomized controlled trial of a multicomponent, targeted, low-literacy educational intervention compared with a nontargeted intervention to boost colorectal cancer screening with fecal immunochemical testing in community clinics
- (2016) Stacy N. Davis et al. CANCER
- The validation of electronic health records in accurately identifying patients eligible for colorectal cancer screening in safety net clinics
- (2016) Amanda F Petrik et al. FAMILY PRACTICE
- Evidence-Based, Reality-Driven Colorectal Cancer Screening Guidelines
- (2016) Sidney J. Winawer et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Screening for Colorectal Cancer
- (2016) et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Pragmatic Trials
- (2016) Ian Ford et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- System Strategies for Colorectal Cancer Screening at Federally Qualified Health Centers
- (2015) Jeanette M. Daly et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
- Impact of continued mailed fecal tests in the patient-centered medical home: Year 3 of the Systems of Support to Increase Colon Cancer Screening and Follow-Up randomized trial
- (2015) Beverly B. Green et al. CANCER
- Two-year follow-up of the effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention to improve adherence to annual colorectal cancer screening in community health centers
- (2015) David W. Baker et al. CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL
- A systematic review identifies valid comorbidity indices derived from administrative health data
- (2015) Marko Yurkovich et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Strategies and Opportunities to STOP Colon Cancer in Priority Populations: Design of a cluster-randomized pragmatic trial
- (2014) Gloria D. Coronado et al. Contemporary Clinical Trials
- Longitudinal predictors of colorectal cancer screening among participants in a randomized controlled trial
- (2014) Caitlin C. Murphy et al. PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
- Comparative Effectiveness of a Multifaceted Intervention to Improve Adherence to Annual Colorectal Cancer Screening in Community Health Centers
- (2014) David W. Baker et al. JAMA Internal Medicine
- Systematic Review: Enhancing the Use and Quality of Colorectal Cancer Screening
- (2013) Debra J. Holden ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- An Automated Intervention With Stepped Increases in Support to Increase Uptake of Colorectal Cancer Screening
- (2013) Beverly B. Green et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Involvement of previous non-participants cannot fully compensate for lower participation in a second round of FIT-screening
- (2013) M.J. Denters et al. Cancer Epidemiology
- Strategies to Improve Repeat Fecal Occult Blood Testing Cancer Screening
- (2013) T. C. Davis et al. CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION
- Advantages of Wordless Instructions on How to Complete a Fecal Immunochemical Test: Lessons from Patient Advisory Council Members of a Federally Qualified Health Center
- (2013) Gloria D. Coronado et al. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION
- Long-Term Mortality after Screening for Colorectal Cancer
- (2013) Aasma Shaukat et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Comparative Effectiveness of Fecal Immunochemical Test Outreach, Colonoscopy Outreach, and Usual Care for Boosting Colorectal Cancer Screening Among the Underserved
- (2013) Samir Gupta et al. JAMA Internal Medicine
- Longitudinal Adherence to Fecal Occult Blood Testing Impacts Colorectal Cancer Screening Quality
- (2011) Ziad F Gellad et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
- Longitudinal Adherence With Fecal Occult Blood Test Screening in Community Practice
- (2010) J. J. Fenton et al. ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE
- Repeat participation in colorectal cancer screening utilizing fecal occult blood testing: A community-based project in a rural setting
- (2010) Monika Janda et al. JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY
- Temporal and Subjective Work Demands in Office-Based Patient Care
- (2010) C. Jeff Jacobson et al. MEDICAL CARE
- Continuity of Care and Cancer Screening Among Health Plan Enrollees
- (2009) Joshua J. Fenton et al. MEDICAL CARE
Find the ideal target journal for your manuscript
Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.
SearchAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started