4.4 Article

Multiple Friends with Benefits: An Optimal Mutualist Management Strategy?

Journal

AMERICAN NATURALIST
Volume 187, Issue 1, Pages E1-E12

Publisher

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/684103

Keywords

bioeconomic models; cheating; ectomycorrhizae; optimal control theory; tree-fungal mutualisms

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) Graduate Research Fellowship
  2. NSF Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grant
  3. NSF [DBI-1401332]
  4. US National Science Foundation [DEB-1145017, DEB-1257545]
  5. Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution's Investment in Science Fund
  6. Division Of Environmental Biology
  7. Direct For Biological Sciences [1145017] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. Division Of Environmental Biology
  9. Direct For Biological Sciences [1257545] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Most mutualisms in nature involve interactions between multispecies mutualist guilds and multiple partner species. While mechanisms such as niche partitioning can explain part of this diversity, the presence of low-quality partners, which produce relatively low returns on investment compared with other guild members, is not well understood. Here, we consider a novel explanation for this persistence: that low-quality partners are actively maintained by their hosts as part of a growth-maximizing strategy, even in the presence of higher-quality alternatives. We use a model inspired by the interaction between host trees and ectomycorrhizal fungi to demonstrate that when the environment is variable, trees maintain low-quality fungal partners that they would not otherwise maintain in constant environments. This active investment, which emerges as a response to saturating returns on investment in higher-quality partners, could contribute to the maintenance of diversity in multispecies mutualisms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available