4.5 Article

D-poor hydrogen in lunar mare basalts assimilated from lunar regolith

Journal

AMERICAN MINERALOGIST
Volume 101, Issue 7-8, Pages 1596-1603

Publisher

MINERALOGICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.2138/am-2016-5582

Keywords

Mare basalt; hydrogen isotopes; lunar regolith

Funding

  1. NASA [NNX13AG40G, NNX12AH64G, NNX11AB29G]
  2. NASA [NNX11AB29G, 149996, NNX12AH64G, 19746, NNX13AG40G, 473680] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Apatite grains in lunar mare basalts contain hydrogen that ranges in D/H ratio by more than a factor of two. For most of these basalts, the D/H ratios in their apatite grains decrease with measures of the host basalts' time spent at elevated temperature, specifically the Fe-Mg homogenization of their pyroxenes. Most basalts with homogeneous pyroxenes (i.e., with constant Fe/Mg ratio) have apatite grains with low D/H (delta D approximate to-100 parts per thousand), whereas most basalts with heterogeneous pyroxenes (i.e., varying or zoned Fe/Mg) have apatite with high D/H (delta D up to similar to+1100 parts per thousand). This relationship suggests that low D/H values were acquired during thermal processing, i.e., during Fe-Mg chemical equilibration, during or after emplacement. This light hydrogen is likely derived from solar wind implanted into the lunar regolith (with delta D from -125 parts per thousand to -800 parts per thousand), and could enter basalts either by assimilation of regolith or by vapor transport from regolith heated by the flow. If a basalt could not interact with regolith rich in solar wind (e.g., it was emplaced onto other fresh basalts), its apatite could retain a magmatic D/H signature. The high D/H component (in the apatites of unequilibrated basalts) is most reasonably that indigenous magmatic hydrogen, i.e., representing hydrogen in the basalt's source mantles, or magmatic hydrogen that was residual after partial degassing of H-2.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available