4.6 Review

The post-cardiac arrest syndrome: A case for lung-brain coupling and opportunities for neuroprotection

Journal

JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages 939-958

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0271678X19835552

Keywords

Cardiac arrest; post-cardiac arrest syndrome; systemic inflammatory response syndrome; blood-brain barrier; neutrophil; innate immune priming; acute lung injury; ischemic neurodegeneration; neuroprotection; damage-associated molecular patterns; pathogen-associated molecular patterns; sepsis

Funding

  1. National Institute Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) [NS092455]
  2. Department of Defense [W81XWH-16-1-0191]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Systemic inflammation and multi-organ failure represent hallmarks of the post-cardiac arrest syndrome (PCAS) and predict severe neurological injury and often fatal outcomes. Current interventions for cardiac arrest focus on the reversal of precipitating cardiac pathologies and the implementation of supportive measures with the goal of limiting damage to at-risk tissue. Despite the widespread use of targeted temperature management, there remain no proven approaches to manage reperfusion injury in the period following the return of spontaneous circulation. Recent evidence has implicated the lung as a moderator of systemic inflammation following remote somatic injury in part through effects on innate immune priming. In this review, we explore concepts related to lung-dependent innate immune priming and its potential role in PCAS. Specifically, we propose and investigate the conceptual model of lung-brain coupling drawing from the broader literature connecting tissue damage and acute lung injury with cerebral reperfusion injury. Subsequently, we consider the role that interventions designed to short-circuit lung-dependent immune priming might play in improving patient outcomes following cardiac arrest and possibly other acute neurological injuries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available