4.6 Article

Defect engineering of black phosphorene towards an enhanced polysulfide host and catalyst for lithium-sulfur batteries: A first principles study

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
Volume 125, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.5082782

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Nature Science Foundation of Shandong province [ZR2017PA002, ZR2016BP09]
  2. National Nature Science Foundation of China [11647159]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018M630947]
  4. Research Fund Program of Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Green Chemical Product Technology [GC201820]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries are widely regarded as one of the most promising next-generation high energy density storage systems, their large-scale applications are seriously impeded by rapid capacity fading and poor Coulombic efficiency owing to the shuttling of lithium polysulfides (LiPSs) and irreversible discharge product Li2S. Here, by means of first principles calculations, we studied defective black phosphorene (BP) as a host material to realize high-performance Li-S batteries, including Stone Wales [SW(55-77)], single, and double vacancy [SV(5-9) and DV(5-9-5)] defects. Our results demonstrate that while BP has moderate adsorption energies towards LiPSs, the presence of defects could enhance the adsorption strength between LiPSs and BP because of increased charge transfer. Particularly, defective BP could strike a good balance between adsorption energy and integrity of LiPSs, which is beneficial to prevent the shuttling of LiPSs. Moreover, during the lithiation process, defective BP not only has narrow bandgaps but also decreases the dissociation energy of Li2S, facilitating the catalytic oxidation of Li2S back to sulfur. Therefore, it is highly desirable to fabricate defective BP to improve the reversible capacity and cycle stability of Li-S batteries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available