4.7 Article

Novel heat pipe radiator for vertical CPU cooling and its experimental study

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER
Volume 130, Issue -, Pages 912-922

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.11.002

Keywords

CPU cooling; Heat pipe radiator; Heat transfer performance; Start-up performance

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51376025]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A vertical radiator with multi pulse condensation ends and a plane evaporating end for vertical CPU cooling is developed. A 304 stainless steel test piece is processed and a detailed experimental study of heat transfer performance and start-up performance is performed. The influence of liquid filling rate, heating power and wind speed on the two performance of vertical heat pipe radiator is analyzed, and compared with aluminum fin computer CPU radiator. The results show that when the radiator works stably, the optimal filling ratio is 25%, the lowest thermal resistance is only 0.1 degrees CM; the average temperature of heat source increases with the increase of heating power and decreases with the wind speed. The temperature distributions of the five cold ends exhibit a symmetry that attenuates from the middle to the both sides. In addition, when the radiator starts up, as the heating power increases, the initial start-up time becomes shorter, the start-up temperature becomes lower, and the stability is also better. But there is no symmetry in the start sequence of the condensation ends. Compared with the current aluminum fin radiator, the vertical radiator has superior heat dissipation performance, temperature uniformity and stability. Such as, under 80 W heating power, the average heat source temperature is 66 degrees C, the average temperature deviation of the heat source is 3.16 degrees C, compared to the aluminum fin radiator, they dropped by 17.3 degrees C and 0.61 degrees C, respectively. (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available