4.7 Article

MET activation confers resistance to cetuximab, and prevents HER2 and HER3 upregulation in head and neck cancer

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 145, Issue 3, Pages 748-762

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32170

Keywords

head and neck cancer; MET; signaling; drug resistance; cetuximab

Categories

Funding

  1. Israel Cancer Research Foundation [17-1693-RCDA]
  2. United State - Israel Binational Science foundation [2017323]
  3. National Institutes of Health [P30CA008748]
  4. Israel Science Foundation [700/16]
  5. Israel Cancer Association [20170024]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An understanding of the mechanisms underlying acquired resistance to cetuximab is urgently needed to improve cetuximab efficacy in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Here, we present a clinical observation that MET pathway activation constitutes the mechanism of acquired resistance to cetuximab in a patient with HNSCC. Specifically, RNA sequencing and mass spectrometry analysis of cetuximab-sensitive (Cetux(Sen)) and cetuximab-resistant (Cetux(Res)) tumors indicated MET amplification and overexpression in the Cetux(Res) tumor compared to the Cetux(Sen) lesion. Stimulation of MET in HNSCC cell lines was sufficient to reactivate the MAPK pathway and to confer resistance to cetuximab in vitro and in vivo. In addition to the direct role of MET in reactivation of the MAPK pathway, MET stimulation abrogates the well-known cetuximab-induced compensatory feedback loop of HER2/HER3 expression. Mechanistically, we showed that the overexpression of HER2 and HER3 following cetuximab treatment is mediated by the ETS homologous transcription factor (EHF), and is suppressed by MET/MAPK pathway activation. Collectively, our findings indicate that evaluation of MET and HER2/HER3 in response to cetuximab in HNSCC patients can provide the rationale of successive line of treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available