4.7 Article

A Blind Stereoscopic Image Quality Evaluator With Segmented Stacked Autoencoders Considering the Whole Visual Perception Route

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages 1314-1328

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIP.2018.2878283

Keywords

Stereoscopic image quality assessment; retinal ganglion cell; lateral geniculate nucleus; segmented stacked auto-encoders; edge quality; color quality

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61871283]
  2. Foundation of Pre-Research on Equipment of China [61403120103]
  3. Joint Foundation of Pre-Research on Equipment from Education Department of China [6141A02022336]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Most of the current blind stereoscopic image quality assessment (SIQA) algorithms cannot show reliable accuracy. One reason is that they do not have the deep architectures and the other reason is that they are designed on the relatively weak biological basis, compared with the findings on the human visual system. In this paper, we propose a Deep Edge and COlor Signal INtegrity Evaluator (DECOSINE) based on the whole visual perception route from eyes to the frontal lobe, and especially focus on the edge and color signal processing in retinal ganglion cells and lateral geniculate nucleus. Furthermore, to model the complex and deep structure of the visual cortex, segmented stacked auto-encoder (S-SAE) is used, which has not utilized for SIQA before. The utilization of the S-SAE complements the weakness of deep learning-based SIQA metrics that require a very long training time. Experiments are conducted on popular SIQA databases, and the superiority of DECOSINE in terms of prediction accuracy and monotonicity is proved. The experimental results show that our model about the whole visual perception route and utilization of S-SAE are effective for SIQA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available