4.6 Article

Comparing existing weeds and commonly used insectary plants as floral resources for a parasitoid

Journal

BIOLOGICAL CONTROL
Volume 81, Issue -, Pages 15-20

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2014.11.003

Keywords

Biological control; Brevicoryne brassicae; Diaeretiella rapae; Fagopyrum esculentum; Diplotaxis erucoides; Lobularia maritima; Capsella bursa-pastoris

Funding

  1. Academic Research (DAR) at the University of Jordan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The potential consequences of deploying weed and non-weed floral resources in a three trophic-level system were evaluated in the laboratory. Four flowering plants were used: the two common weeds shepherd's purse Capsella bursa-pastoris (globally widespread) and white rocket Diplotaxis erucoides (a common weed in Europe) and two common flowering plants: buckwheat Fagopyrum esculentum and alyssum Lobularia maritima. Adults of the aphid parasitoid Diaeretiella rapae were exposed to flowering buckwheat and survived 4-5 times longer than those in the control (water only) and 2-3 times longer than when provided with flowering alyssum, or the other two species. All plant species significantly increased parasitoid longevity, egg load and achieved fecundity compared with the control, with buckwheat having the greatest effect. This work illustrates that the functional diversity of 'weeds', if appropriately managed, has potential to enhance biological control efficacy without the need for agronomic and other challenges which are involved in adding specific non-crop flowering plants such as buckwheat to agroecosystems. In the field, factors such as the plants' phenology, agronomy and competitiveness with the crop will need to be evaluated before they can be truly ranked. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available