4.6 Article

The predictive value of the preoperative C-reactive protein-albumin ratio for early recurrence and chemotherapy benefit in patients with gastric cancer after radical gastrectomy: using randomized phase III trial data

Journal

GASTRIC CANCER
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages 1016-1028

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10120-019-00936-w

Keywords

Gastric cancer; Early recurrence; Adjuvant chemotherapy; C-reactive protein-albumin ratio; Post-recurrence survival

Funding

  1. Scientific and Technological Innovation Joint Capital Projects of Fujian Province [2016Y9031]
  2. National Nature Science Foundation of China [81871899]
  3. Construction Project of Fujian Province Minimally Invasive Medical Center [[2017]171]
  4. second batch of Special Support Funds for Fujian Province Innovation and Entrepreneurship Talents [2016B013]
  5. QIHANG Fund of Fujian Medical University [2016QH025]
  6. Fujian Province Medical Innovation Project [2015-CXB-16]
  7. Fujian Provincial Health and Family Planning Commission Joint Project [WKJ2016-2-27]
  8. Chinese Physicians' Association Young Physician Respiratory Research Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background The definition and predictors of early recurrence (ER) for gastric cancer (GC) patients after radical gastrectomy are unclear. Methods A minimum-p value approach was used to evaluate the optimal cutoff value of recurrence-free survival to determine ER and late recurrence (LR). Receiver operating characteristic curves were generated for inflammatory indices. Potential risk factors for ER were assessed with a Cox regression model. A decision curve analysis was performed to evaluate the clinical utility. Results A total of 401 patients recruited in a clinical trial (NCT02327481) from January 2015 to April 2016 were included in this study. The optimal length of recurrence-free survival to distinguish between ER (n = 44) and LR (n = 52) was 12 months. Factors associated with ER included a preoperative C-reactive protein-albumin ratio (CAR) >= 0.131, stage III and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (PAC) > 3 cycles. The risk model consisting of both the CAR and TNM stage had a higher predictive ability and better clinical utility than TNM stage alone. Further stratification analysis of the stage III patients found that for the patients with a CAR < 0.131, both PAC with 1-3 cycles (p = 0.029) and > 3 cycles (p < 0.001) could reduce the risk of ER. However, for patients with a CAR >= 0.131, a benefit was observed only if they received PAC > 3 cycles (54.2% vs 16.0%, p = 0.004), rather than 1-3 cycles (58.3% vs 54.2%, p = 0.824). Conclusions A recurrence-free interval of 12 months was found to be the optimal threshold for differentiating between ER and LR. Preoperative CAR was a promising predictor of ER and PAC response. PAC with 1-3 cycles may not exert a protective effect against ER for stage III GC patients with CAR >= 0.131.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available