4.7 Article

Early-life intake of major trace elements, bisphenol A, tetrabromobisphenol A and fatty acids: Comparing human milk and commercial infant formulas

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH
Volume 169, Issue -, Pages 246-255

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2018.11.017

Keywords

Bisphenol A; Chemical elements; Human milk; Formula milk; Fatty acids

Funding

  1. European Union [FP-603946]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [AGL2016-5476-R, AGL2016-78942-R]
  3. Health Department of Catalonia Government trough Pla Estrategic de Recerca i Innovacio en Salut (PERIS 2016-2020)
  4. REQUIMTE
  5. FCT (Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia)
  6. FEDER [UID/QUI/50006/2013 - POCl/01/0145/FEDER/007265]
  7. FCT/MEC
  8. FEDER
  9. FCT [IF/01616/2015]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the present study, the presence of a wide spectrum of major and trace elements (As, Ag, Al, Ba, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Hg, Mn, Ni, Sr, Sb, Se, Sn, Pb, V, and Zn), fatty acids, as well as some pollutants like free and total BPA and tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA), was analysed in human milk (n = 53) and infant formula (n = 50) samples. In addition, the infant exposure to these chemicals was assessed. The content of free BPA and several elements (Al, Ca, Cr, Cu, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, Na, Ni, Sn, Sr, and Zn) was higher (p < 0.01) in infant formula samples. Furthermore, human milk contained levels of BPA and elements that, in almost all cases, were well below their respective EFSA and/or WHO thresholds, being also independent of the maternal characteristics (e.g., age, BMI or breastfeeding period). The fatty acid profiling also revealed major differences between human milk and infant formulas, which should be taken in account in the development of new formulas as well as in specific recommendations for the diet of breastfeeding mothers. Anyway, the results of this study reinforce that breastfeeding should be always the first feeding option in early life.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available