4.7 Article

Contaminants in Atlantic walruses in Svalbard Part 2: Relationships with endocrine and immune systems

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
Volume 246, Issue -, Pages 658-667

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.11.097

Keywords

Pollutant; Marine mammal; Thyroid hormone; qPCR; mRNA

Funding

  1. Fram Centre Incentive Funding
  2. Norwegian-Russian Environmental Commission
  3. Fram Centre Fjord and Coast Program
  4. Norwegian Polar Institute
  5. Norwegian Research Council [273470/E10]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Marine mammals in the Barents Sea region have among the highest levels of contaminants recorded in the Arctic and the Atlantic walrus (Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus) is one of the most contaminated species within this region. We therefore investigated the relationships bewteen blubber concentrations of lipophilic persistent organic pollutants (POPS) and plasma concentrations of perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) and markers of endocrine and immune functions in adult male Atlantic walruses (n = 38) from Svalbard, Norway. To do so, we assessed plasma concentrations of five forms of thyroid hormones and transcript levels of genes related to the endocrine and immune systems as endpoints; transcript levels of seven genes in blubber and 23 genes in blood cells were studied. Results indicated that plasma total thyroxine (TT4) concentrations and ratio of TT4 and reverse triiodothyronine decreased with increasing blubber concentrations of lipophilic POPs. Blood cell transcript levels of genes involved in the function of T and B cells (FC like receptors 2 and 5, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 and protein tyrosine phosphatase non-receptor type 22) were increased with plasma PFAS concentrations. These results suggest that changes in thyroid and immune systems in adult male walruses are linked to current levels of contaminant exposure. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available