4.7 Article

Impact of climate change on energy use and bioclimatic design of residential buildings in the 21st century in Argentina

Journal

ENERGY AND BUILDINGS
Volume 184, Issue -, Pages 216-229

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.12.015

Keywords

Heating and cooling energy consumption; Future climate; Thermal simulation of buildings

Funding

  1. National Agency of Scientific and Technical Promotion [ANPCYT PICT 2014-2605]
  2. Universidad Nacional de Salta

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Climate change will have great impacts on building' energy consumption and design of future buildings should consider this situation. The aims of this research are to evaluate the impact of climate change on the energy performance of residential buildings and to analyze if bioclimatic strategies that are appropriate for present climatic conditions should be applied in the design of future buildings. A compact conventional housing that represents an Argentinean typical mid-income house was simulated with EnergyPlus software and calibrated with measured data. Energy consumption and bioclimatic strategies were analyzed for future data under A2 scenario. The change of annual energy use between the baseline period (1961-1990) and 2080 is predicted to range from -25% to 8% for conventional housing buildings. The energy destined to air heating and cooling will be 23%-59% lower and 360-790% higher, respectively, in 2080 than in the baseline period (1961-1990). These values correspond to decreases between 6.0 and 7.6 kWh/m(2)-decade (heating) and increases between 1.7 and 8.4 kWhim(2)-decade (cooling). Recommendations on future building design and building retrofit are done. Sunshading together a with reduction of direct solar gains and natural ventilation were found to be the most effective design strategies to counteract climate changes in future buildings. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available