4.7 Article

Comparison between Catalytic Fast Pyrolysis and Catalytic Fast Hydropyrolysis for the Production of Liquid Fuels in a Fluidized Bed Reactor

Journal

ENERGY & FUELS
Volume 33, Issue 4, Pages 3199-3209

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.8b03782

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Tree Free Biomass Solutions
  2. Weyerhaueser Endowmentin Paper Science and Engineering

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report results for the conversion of Arundo donax into liquid transportation fuels with an HZSM-5 catalyst via catalytic fast pyrolysis (CFP, inert atmosphere) and catalytic fast hydropyrolysis (CHP, hydrogen atmosphere), with the goal of comparing the two technologies and understanding the effect of hydrogen on the product yields and composition. For CFP, we evaluated the effects of temperature, weight hourly space velocity, and pressure. The highest yield of hydrocarbons for CFP at atmospheric pressure was 11.6 C %. The main effects of adding hydrogen (CHP) were a decrease in the yield of coke, increase in the yield of liquid hydrocarbons, and increase in gaseous olefins. The introduction of hydrogen also led to a 17% reduction of coke relative to the coke produced under a helium atmosphere, with reduced pore blockage and surface area loss relative to CFP. Overall, CHP with HZSM-S at 400 degrees C and 35 bar can produce 8.9 gal/ton of liquid hydrocarbons (mostly BTX), as opposed to 6.0 gal/ton from CFP.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available