4.5 Article

Effect of Dispersion Solvents in Catalyst Inks on the Performance and Durability of Catalyst Layers in Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells

Journal

ENERGIES
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en12030549

Keywords

catalyst layer; ionomer dispersion; durability; proton exchange membrane fuel cell

Categories

Funding

  1. Sangmyung University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Five different ionomer dispersions using water-isopropanol (IPA) and N-methylpyrrolidone (NMP) were investigated as ionomer binders for catalyst layers in proton exchange membrane fuel cells. The distribution of ionomer plays an important role in the design of high-performance porous electrode catalyst layers since the transport of species, such as oxygen and protons, is controlled by the thickness of the ionomer on the catalyst surface and the continuity of the ionomer and gas networks in the catalyst layer, with the transport of electrons being related to the continuity of the carbon particle network. In this study, the effect of solvents in ionomer dispersions on the performance and durability of catalyst layers (CLs) is investigated. Five different types of catalyst inks were used: (i) ionomer dispersed in NMP; (ii) ionomer dispersed in water-IPA; (iii) ionomer dispersed in NMP, followed by adding water-IPA; (iv) ionomer dispersed in water-IPA, followed by adding NMP; and (v) a mixture of ionomer dispersed in NMP and ionomer dispersed in water-IPA. Dynamic light scattering of the five dispersions showed different average particles sizes: similar to 0.40 m for NMP, 0.91-1.75 m for the mixture, and similar to 2.02 m for water-IPA. The membrane-electrode assembly prepared from an ionomer dispersion with a larger particle size (i.e., water-IPA) showed better performance, while that prepared from a dispersion with a smaller particle size (i.e., NMP) showed better durability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available