4.6 Article

Optogenetic activation of mechanically insensitive afferents in mouse colorectum reveals chemosensitivity

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.00430.2015

Keywords

channelrhodopsin2; single fiber; silent afferents; irritable bowel syndrome; afferent sensitization; inflammatory soup

Funding

  1. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [K01-DK-100460, R01-DK-093525]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Feng B, Joyce SC, Gebhart GF. Optogenetic activation of mechanically insensitive afferents in mouse colorectum reveals chemosensitivity. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 310: G790-G798, 2016. First published February 25, 2016; doi: 10.1152/ajpgi. 00430.2015.-The sensory innervation of the distal colorectum includes mechanically insensitive afferents (MIAs; similar to 25%), which acquire mechanosensitivity in persistent visceral hypersensitivity and thus generate de novo input to the central nervous system. We utilized an optogenetic approach to bypass the process of transduction (generator potential) and focus on transformation (spike initiation) at colorectal MIA sensory terminals, which is otherwise not possible in typical functional studies. From channelrhodopsin2-expressing mice (driven by Advillin-Cre), the distal colorectum with attached pelvic nerve was harvested for ex vivo single-fiber recordings. Afferent receptive fields (RFs) were identified by electrical stimulation and tested for response to mechanical stimuli (probing, stroking, and stretch), and afferents were classified as either MIAs or mechanosensitive afferents (MSAs). All MIA and MSA RFs were subsequently stimulated optically and MIAs were also tested for activation/ sensitization with inflammatory soup (IS), acidic hypertonic solution (AHS), and/or bile salts (BS). Responses to pulsed optical stimuli (1-10 Hz) were comparable between MSAs and MIAs whereas 43% of MIAs compared with 86% of MSAs responded tonically to stepped optical stimuli. Tonic-spiking MIAs responded preferentially to AHS (an osmotic stimulus) whereas non-tonicspiking MIAs responded to IS (an inflammatory stimulus). A significant proportion of MIAs were also sensitized by BS. These results reveal transformation as a critical factor underlying the differences between MIAs (osmosensors vs. inflammatory sensors), revealing a previously unappreciated heterogeneity of MIA endings. The current study draws attention to the sensory encoding of MIA nerve endings that likely contribute to afferent sensitization and thus have important roles in visceral pain.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available