4.6 Article

Anti-inflammatory effects of Bifidobacterium longum subsp infantis secretions on fetal human enterocytes are mediated by TLR-4 receptors

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.00090.2016

Keywords

Toll-like receptors; immature enterocytes; probiotic secretions; Bifidobacterium infants

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01-HD-12437, R0-1-HD-059126, P01-DK-033506, P30-DK-040561]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The therapeutic and preventive application of probiotics for necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) has been supported by more and more experimental and clinical evidence in which Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR-4) exerts a significant role. In immune cells, probiotics not only regulate the expression of TLR-4 but also use the TLR-4 to modulate the immune response. Probiotics may also use the TLR-4 in immature enterocytes for anti-inflammation. Here we demonstrate that probiotic conditioned media (PCM) from Bifidobacterium longum supp infantis but not isolated organisms attenuates interleukin-6 (IL-6) induction in response to IL-1 beta by using TLR-4 in a human fetal small intestinal epithelial cell line (H4 cells), human fetal small intestinal xenografts, mouse fetal small intestinal organ culture tissues, and primary NEC enterocytes. Furthermore, we show that PCM, using TLR-4, downregulates the mRNA expression of interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase 2 (IRAK-2), a common adapter protein shared by IL-1 beta and TLR-4 signaling. PCM also reduces the phosphorylation of the activator-protein 1 (AP-1) transcription factors c-Jun and c-Fos in response to IL-1 beta stimulation in a TLR-4-dependent manner. This study suggests that PCM may use TLR-4 through IRAK-2 and via AP-1 to prevent IL-1-beta-induced IL-6 induction in immature enterocytes. Based on these observations, the combined use of probiotics and anti-TLR-4 therapy to prevent NEC may not be a good strategy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available