4.1 Review

Quality initiatives in pediatric transplantation

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages 64-72

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MOT.0000000000000595

Keywords

improving renal outcomes collaborative; learning networks; pediatric heart transplant society; pediatric transplant quality; performance improvement plan; starzl network for excellence in pediatric transplantation; society of pediatric liver transplantation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review Pediatric transplantation faces unique challenges in implementing dynamic quality improvement measures because of proportionally smaller volumes compared to adults, logistics of being integrated successfully within larger or complex hospital systems, lack of adult-affiliated transplant centers, varying focus in prioritization of relevant outcome metrics, and potential lack of sufficient resources. Recent findings To address these challenges, multiinstitutional collaborations have developed which have proven increasingly effective in driving awareness and quality improvement measures to supplement regulatory efforts in the pediatric population. Relevant work from the Pediatric Heart Transplant Society and Studies in Pediatric Liver Transplantation will be highlighted. The introduction of learning networks such as the Improving Renal Outcomes Collaborative and the Starzl Network for Excellence in Pediatric Transplantation have further focused on continuous learning initiatives in renal and liver transplantation using collaboration and patient informed measures. Summary Optimal transplant performance improvement is fully integrated into health delivery at all points of the patient pathway. Progress in performance improvement will require ongoing integration of big data solutions, improved patient engagement and technology solutions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available