4.7 Article

Digital image correlation (DIC) for measurement of strains and displacements in coarse, low volume-fraction FRP composites used in civil infrastructure

Journal

COMPOSITE STRUCTURES
Volume 212, Issue -, Pages 43-57

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.01.024

Keywords

DIC; FRP; Strain fields; Bond; FRP anchors; Strengthening

Funding

  1. New Zealand Earthquake Commission
  2. QuakeCoRE, a New Zealand Tertiary Education Commission
  3. Centre of Advanced Composite Materials at the University of Auckland

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Accurately measured strains are critical when investigating the application of Fiber Reinforced Polymer (FRP) materials, but traditional mechanical strain measurement methods have several critical drawbacks related to the installation process and the recording capabilities of the devices. FRP materials typically used in the civil engineering field feature large asymmetries and heterogeneity originated from the manual installation procedures, as opposed to the highly controlled FRP fabrication methods used in other fields that result in more homogeneous materials. The feasibility of using an optical full-field Digital Image Correlation (DIC) technique for measurement of strain fields on FRP materials used in the civil engineering industry has been investigated and the level of error in the DIC method when using more traditional methods was determined. The main advantage of using DIC over more traditional methods, which is the capacity of DIC to measure full field strains instead of strains at isolated points, has been demonstrated by providing exemplar measurements of various specimens of FRP materials. The reported strain fields are examples of what was obtained during an experimental campaign to understand the behavior of FRP anchors and other materials. The main conclusions drawn from the observation of those strain fields are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available