4.6 Article

Neurostimulation Reveals Context-Dependent Arbitration Between Model-Based and Model-Free Reinforcement Learning

Journal

CEREBRAL CORTEX
Volume 29, Issue 11, Pages 4850-4862

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhz019

Keywords

goal-directed; habitual; reinforcement learning; tDCS; ventrolateral PFC

Categories

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [141965]
  2. Samsung Research Funding Center of Samsung Electronics [SRFC-TC1603-06]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

While it is established that humans use model-based (MB) and model-free (MF) reinforcement learning in a complementary fashion, much less is known about how the brain determines which of these systems should control behavior at any given moment. Here we provide causal evidence for a neural mechanism that acts as a context-dependent arbitrator between both systems. We applied excitatory and inhibitory transcranial direct current stimulation over a region of the left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex previously found to encode the reliability of both learning systems. The opposing neural interventions resulted in a bidirectional shift of control between MB and MF learning. Stimulation also affected the sensitivity of the arbitration mechanism itself, as it changed how often subjects switched between the dominant system over time. Both of these effects depended on varying task contexts that either favored MB or MF control, indicating that this arbitration mechanism is not context-invariant but flexibly incorporates information about current environmental demands.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available