4.4 Article

Mapping black ash dominated stands using geospatial and forest inventory data in northern Minnesota, USA

Journal

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH
Volume 49, Issue 8, Pages 892-902

Publisher

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1139/cjfr-2018-0481

Keywords

compound topographic index (CTI); remote sensing; black ash; emerald ash borer; forest inventory

Categories

Funding

  1. Minnesota Environmental and Natural Resources Trust Fund
  2. Upper Great Lakes and Midwest Landscape Conservation Cooperative
  3. Department of Interior's Northeast Climate Adaptation Science Center
  4. Colorado State University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Emerald ash borer (EAB; Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire, 1888) has been a persistent disturbance for ash forests in the United States since 2002. Of particular concern is the impact that EAB will have on the ecosystem functioning of wetlands dominated by black ash (Fraxinus nigra Marsh.). In preparation, forest managers need reliable and complete maps of black ash dominated stands. Traditionally, forest survey data from the United States Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) Program have provided rigorous measures of tree species at large spatial extents but are limited when providing estimates for smaller management units (e.g., stands). Fortunately, geospatial data can extend forest survey information by generating predictions of forest attributes at scales finer than those of the FIA sampling grid. In this study, geospatial data were integrated with FIA data in a randomForest model to estimate and map black ash dominated stands in northern Minnesota in the United States. The model produced low error rates (overall error = 14.5%; area under the curve (AUC) = 0.92) and was strongly informed by predictors from soil saturation and phenology. These results improve upon FIA-based spatial estimates at national extents by providing forest managers with accurate, fine-scale maps (30 m spatial resolution) of black ash stand dominance that could ultimately support landscape-level EAB risk and vulnerability assessments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available