4.6 Article

Appraising growth differentiation factor 15 as a promising biomarker in digestive system tumors: a meta-analysis

Journal

BMC CANCER
Volume 19, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-5385-y

Keywords

Cytokine growth differentiation factor 15; Digestive system tumor; Diagnosis; Prognosis; Meta-analysis

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundPrevious studies have highlighted cytokine growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF-15) as a potential biomarker for digestive system tumors (DST). This study sought to assess the feasibility of using GDF-15 as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in DST.MethodsEligible studies from multiple online databases were reviewed. Meta-analyses of diagnostic parameters were carried out using standard statistical methods. Study-specific hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to estimate the strength of the relationship between GDF-15 levels and clinical prognosis.ResultsWe identified 17 eligible studies comprising 3966 patients with DST. The sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) for the discriminative performance of GDF-15 as a diagnostic biomarker were 0.74 (95% CI: 0.68-0.80), 0.83 (95% CI: 0.75-0.89), and 0.84, respectively. Moreover, increased GDF-15 expression levels were markedly associated with unfavorable overall survival (OS) in patients with DST (HR=2.34, 95% CI: 2.03-2.70, P<0.001; I-2=0.0%) and colorectal cancer (CRC) (HR=2.27, 95% CI: 1.96-2.63, P<0.001; I-2=0.0%). Stratification by cancer type, test matrix, ethnicity, and cut-off setting also illustrated the robustness of the diagnostic value of GDF-15 in DST.ConclusionCollectively, our data suggest that GDF-15 expression level may have value as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker, independent of other, traditional biomarkers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available