4.7 Article

Fratricide-resistant CD1a-specific CAR T cells for the treatment of cortical T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 133, Issue 21, Pages 2291-2304

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2018-10-882944

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. European Research Council (H2020) [CoG-2014-646903]
  2. Agencia Estatal de Investigacion/European Regional Development Fund [SAF2016-80481-R, SAF2016-75442-R]
  3. Catalunya Government [SGR330]
  4. Asociacion Espanola Contra el Cancer, Beca FERO
  5. ISCIII/FEDER [PI17/01028]
  6. Obra Social La Caixa-Fundacio Josep Carreras
  7. Catalan Government
  8. [CP15/00014]
  9. MRC [MR/R006237/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Relapsed/refractory T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) has a dismal outcome, and no effective targeted immunotherapies for T-ALL exist. The extension of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells (CARTs) to T-ALL remains challenging because the shared expression of target antigens between CARTs and T-ALL blasts leads to CART fratricide. CD1a is exclusively expressed in cortical T-ALL (coT-ALL), a major subset of T-ALL, and retained at relapse. This article reports that the expression of CD1a is mainly restricted to developing cortical thymocytes, and neither CD34(+) progenitors nor T cells express CD1a during ontogeny, confining the risk of on-target/off-tumor toxicity. We thus developed and preclinically validated a CD1a-specific CAR with robust and specific cytotoxicity in vitro and antileukemic activity in vivo in xenograft models of coT-ALL, using both cell lines and coT-ALL patient-derived primary blasts. CD1a-CARTs are fratricide resistant, persist long term in vivo (retaining antileukemic activity in re-challenge experiments), and respond to viral antigens. Our data support the therapeutic and safe use of fratricide-resistant CD1a-CARTs for relapsed/refractory coT-ALL.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available