4.6 Review

Immune checkpoints and the regulation of tolerogenicity in dendritic cells: Implications for autoimmunity and immunotherapy

Journal

AUTOIMMUNITY REVIEWS
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages 359-368

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.autrev.2019.02.006

Keywords

Immune checkpoints; Tolerogenic dendritic cells; Tolerance; Autoimmunity; Immunotherapy

Categories

Funding

  1. Corporacion de Fomento de la Produccion (CORFO) [13CTI-21526]
  2. Programa Semillero de Investigacion, DGI, Universidad de Antofagasta [5311]
  3. FONDECYT [1150862, 1190830]
  4. Millennium Institute on Immunology and Immunotherapy [P09-016-F]
  5. SEP-UNAM-FUNAM in Mexico

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The immune system is responsible for defending the host from a large variety of potential pathogens, while simultaneously avoiding immune reactivity towards self-components. Self-tolerance has to be tightly maintained throughout several central and peripheral processes; immune checkpoints are imperative for regulating the immunity/tolerance balance. Dendritic cells (DCs) are specialized cells that capture antigens, and either activate or inhibit antigen-specific T cells. Therefore, they play a key role at inducing and maintaining immune tolerance. DCs that suppress the immune response have been called tolerogenic dendritic cells (tolDCs). Given their potential as a therapy to prevent transplant rejection and autoimmune damage, several strategies are under development to generate tolDCs, in order to avoid activation and expansion of self-reactive T cells. In this article, we summarize the current knowledge relative to the main features of tolDCs, their mechanisms of action and their therapeutic use for autoimmune diseases. Based on the literature reviewed, autologous antigen-specific tolDCs might constitute a promising strategy to suppress autoreactive T cells and reduce detrimental inflammatory processes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available