4.7 Article

Effect of Compression Ratio on the Performance and Emission Characteristics, and Cycle-to-Cycle Combustion variations of a Spark Ignition Engine Fueled with Bio-methane Surrogate

Journal

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
Volume 148, Issue -, Pages 1440-1453

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.11.057

Keywords

Spark-ignition engine; Bio-methane; Gasoline; Comparative study; Statistical analysis; Cycle-to-cycle combustion variations

Funding

  1. Indian Institute of Technology Madras [MEE/15-16/661/NFSC/MAYA]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Low-carbon fuels such as bio-methane, obtained from biomass gasification consisting 96-98% of methane by volume, is a promising alternative fuel for internal-combustion engines. In the present work, methane is used as a surrogate of bio-methane for studying the engine characteristics. First, a comparative study was performed on a single-cylinder, water-cooled, variable compression ratio, spark-ignition engine operating under methane and gasoline fuels with compression ratio (CR) of 8.5:1. Subsequently, the effect of compression ratio was investigated on the performance, combustion including cycle-to-cycle combustion variations through statistical analysis, and emissions, when engine was operated over a wide load range at 8.5:1, 10:1 and 12:1 CRs under methane. It was found that the brake specific energy consumption and emissions were reduced for methane compared to gasoline at all operating loads. Results showed that when the CR was increased from 8.5:1 to 12:1 at low operating load of 5 N-m, brake specific fuel consumption was reduced by 7.2% and the average location of peak in-cylinder pressure (theta(pmax)) was shifted towards the TDC, i.e. 17.4 to 13.5 CAD ATDC, with a decrease in cycle-to-cycle combustion variations. In addition, theta(pmax) showed linear and quadratic relationships with peak in cylinder pressure and IMEP, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available