4.7 Article

Oncologic Effects of Primary Tumor-Sidedness on Patients with Stages 1-3 Colon Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Journal

ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages 1366-1375

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-07164-7

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Previous studies comparing the oncologic outcomes of primary tumor-sidedness for patients with colon cancer have reported a worse prognosis for those with right-sided tumors. However, most of these studies evaluated patients with metastatic disease. Methods. PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies that assessed the effects of primary tumor-sidedness on survival outcomes for patients with stages 1, 2, and 3 colon cancer. The hazard ratio (HR) for primary tumor location was estimated for overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Results. The inclusion criteria were met by 37 studies involving 581,542 patients. The patients with a right-sided tumor had better CSS (HR, 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56-0.80; p<0.0001) among those with stage 1 cancer as well as better OS (HR, 0.89; 95% CI 0.86-0.92; I-2=19%) and CSS (HR, 0.78; 95% CI 0.70-0.86; I-2=78%) among those with stage 2 cancer. In contrast, among the patients with stage 3 cancer, those with a right-sided tumor had worse OS (HR, 1.12; 95% CI 1.04-1.20; p=0.002), CSS (HR, 1.05; 95% CI 1.01-1.10; p=0.02), and DFS (HR, 1.32; 95% CI 1.07-1.63; p=0.008). Conclusions. Primary tumor location may be a prognostic factor for patients with non-metastatic colon cancer. The prognosis for patients with right-sided tumor may be better for those with stage 1 or 2 cancer, but worse for those with stage 3 cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available