Genomic Contextualism: Shifting the Rhetoric of Genetic Exceptionalism
Published 2019 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Genomic Contextualism: Shifting the Rhetoric of Genetic Exceptionalism
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages 51-63
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Online
2019-01-25
DOI
10.1080/15265161.2018.1544304
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Why rhetoric matters for ecology
- (2016) Caroline Gottschalk Druschke et al. FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT
- Eliciting preferences on secondary findings: the Preferences Instrument for Genomic Secondary Results
- (2016) Kyle B. Brothers et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- A systematic literature review of individuals’ perspectives on broad consent and data sharing in the United States
- (2015) Nanibaa' A. Garrison et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Return of Genomic Results to Research Participants: The Floor, the Ceiling, and the Choices In Between
- (2014) Gail P. Jarvik et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
- ACMG policy statement: updated recommendations regarding analysis and reporting of secondary findings in clinical genome-scale sequencing
- (2014) GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Resistance to Therapy in Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia
- (2014) Jacqueline Lehmann-Che et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Paternalism and the ACMG recommendations on genomic incidental findings: patients seen but not heard
- (2013) Anne Townsend et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing
- (2013) Robert C. Green et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Ethical, legal and social implications of incorporating genomic information into electronic health records
- (2013) Ribhi Hazin et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Reporting Genomic Sequencing Results to Ordering Clinicians
- (2013) Robert C. Green et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Incidental Findings from Clinical Genome-Wide Sequencing: A Review
- (2013) Z. Lohn et al. Journal of Genetic Counseling
- Identifying Personal Genomes by Surname Inference
- (2013) M. Gymrek et al. SCIENCE
- Public views on the donation and use of human biological samples in biomedical research: a mixed methods study
- (2013) Celine Lewis et al. BMJ Open
- Managing incidental findings and research results in genomic research involving biobanks and archived data sets
- (2012) Susan M. Wolf et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Black African immigrant community leaders' views on participation in genomics research and DNA biobanking
- (2012) Aaron G. Buseh et al. NURSING OUTLOOK
- Deploying whole genome sequencing in clinical practice and public health: Meeting the challenge one bin at a time
- (2011) Jonathan S Berg et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Charting a course for genomic medicine from base pairs to bedside
- (2011) Eric D. Green et al. NATURE
- A map of human genome variation from population-scale sequencing
- (2010) Richard M. Durbin et al. NATURE
- Public Opinion about the Importance of Privacy in Biobank Research
- (2009) David J. Kaufman et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
- Public understandings of genetics and health
- (2009) CM Condit CLINICAL GENETICS
- Confidentiality, privacy, and security of genetic and genomic test information in electronic health records: points to consider
- (2009) Amy L McGuire et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Duty to disclose what? Querying the putative obligation to return research results to participants
- (2008) F A Miller et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS
- Resolving Individuals Contributing Trace Amounts of DNA to Highly Complex Mixtures Using High-Density SNP Genotyping Microarrays
- (2008) Nils Homer et al. PLoS Genetics
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started