4.0 Article

SNPs detection by eBWT positional clustering

Journal

ALGORITHMS FOR MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Volume 14, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13015-019-0137-8

Keywords

BWT; LCP array; SNPs; Reference-free; Assembly-free

Funding

  1. [RBSI146R5L]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundSequencing technologies keep on turning cheaper and faster, thus putting a growing pressure for data structures designed to efficiently store raw data, and possibly perform analysis therein. In this view, there is a growing interest in alignment-free and reference-free variants calling methods that only make use of (suitably indexed) raw reads data.ResultsWe develop the positional clustering theory that (i) describes how the extended Burrows-Wheeler Transform (eBWT) of a collection of reads tends to cluster together bases that cover the same genome position (ii) predicts the size of such clusters, and (iii) exhibits an elegant and precise LCP array based procedure to locate such clusters in the eBWT. Based on this theory, we designed and implemented an alignment-free and reference-free SNPs calling method, and we devised a consequent SNPs calling pipeline. Experiments on both synthetic and real data show that SNPs can be detected with a simple scan of the eBWT and LCP arrays as, in accordance with our theoretical framework, they are within clusters in the eBWT of the reads. Finally, our tool intrinsically performs a reference-free evaluation of its accuracy by returning the coverage of each SNP.ConclusionsBased on the results of the experiments on synthetic and real data, we conclude that the positional clustering framework can be effectively used for the problem of identifying SNPs, and it appears to be a promising approach for calling other type of variants directly on raw sequencing data.AvailabilityThe software ebwt2snp is freely available for academic use at: https://github.com/nicolaprezza/ebwt2snp.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available