4.8 Article

Electron Transfer in Nanoscale Contact Electrification: Effect of Temperature in the Metal-Dielectric Case

Journal

ADVANCED MATERIALS
Volume 31, Issue 17, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.201808197

Keywords

contact electrification; electron transfer; Kelvin probe force microscopy; temperature effect

Funding

  1. National Key RD Project [2016YFA0202704]
  2. Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission [Z171100000317001, Z171100002017017, Y3993113DF]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51432005, 5151101243, 51561145021, 51605033]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The phenomenon of contact electrification (CE) has been known for thousands of years, but the nature of the charge carriers and their transfer mechanisms are still under debate. Here, the CE and triboelectric charging process are studied for a metal-dielectric case at different thermal conditions by using atomic force microscopy and Kelvin probe force microscopy. The charge transfer process at the nanoscale is found to follow the modified thermionic-emission model. In particular, the focus here is on the effect of a temperature difference between two contacting materials on the CE. It is revealed that hotter solids tend to receive positive triboelectric charges, while cooler solids tend to be negatively charged, which suggests that the temperature-difference-induced charge transfer can be attributed to the thermionic-emission effect, in which the electrons are thermally excited and transfer from a hotter surface to a cooler one. Further, a thermionic-emission band-structure model is proposed to describe the electron transfer between two solids at different temperatures. The findings also suggest that CE can occur between two identical materials owing to the existence of a local temperature difference arising from the nanoscale rubbing of surfaces with different curvatures/roughness.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available