4.1 Article

The quantitative analysis of the human papillomavirus DNA load in submandibular gland lesions with droplet digital polymerase chain reaction

Journal

ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA
Volume 139, Issue 1, Pages 105-110

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00016489.2018.1562215

Keywords

Salivary gland; HPV; p16; nested PCR; ddPCR; DNA load

Funding

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [JP17K11316, JP15K10802]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The relationship between infection with human papillomavirus (HPV) and tumorigenesis of salivary gland remains controversial. Objectives: This study explored the relationship between HPV and salivary gland lesions as well as that of the HPV infection status and p16(INK4A) immunoreactivity. The HPV DNA loads were also quantitatively evaluated. Materials and Methods: Tissue samples from 31 submandibular gland lesions were evaluated. p16(INK4A) immunohistochemical (IHC) staining, nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR), DNA sequencing, and droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) were performed. Results: Non-neoplastic lesion, benign tumors, and malignant tumors were noted in 9, 16, 6 cases, respectively. p16(INK4A) immunoreactivity was higher in malignant tumors than in benign tumors (50.0% vs. 6.3%). Single PCR with MY09/11 found that all samples were negative. Nevertheless, nested PCR revealed a high HPV-DNA positivity rate of 96.8%. No relationship between the HPV status and p16(INK4A) immunoreactivity was shown. HPV-18 was the only subtype identified in this study. ddPCR showed significantly lower HPV-18 DNA loads in submandibular gland lesions than in oropharyngeal cancers. Conclusions: HPV-DNA positivity and p16(INK4A)-immunoreactivity were not correlated in submandibular gland lesions. The loads of HPV DNA detected in this study were small. HPV positivity therefore may not be associated with tumorigenesis of the submandibular gland.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available