4.2 Article

Phenotypic and molecular characterization of focal dermal hypoplasia in 18 individuals

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31473

Keywords

PORCN; focal dermal hypoplasia; Goltz syndrome; limb defects; aplasia cutis; adipose nodules; mosaic; deletion; skin hypoplasia; clinical diagnostic criteria

Funding

  1. National Foundation for Ectodermal Dysplasias
  2. Medical Genetics Research Fellowship Program [T32 GM0752638]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Focal dermal hypoplasia, or Goltz syndrome, is a highly variable X-linked dominant disorder with abnormalities in ectoderm and mesoderm derived tissues. Classic clinical features include patchy hypoplastic skin, split hand/foot deformities, and ocular malformations. We aimed to refine the understanding of the phenotypic spectrum and natural history of this disorder and now present multi-disciplinary clinical description and medical history review for 18 patients with focal dermal hypoplasia. All disease characteristics were analyzed and compiled in aggregate to aid in development of clinical diagnostic criteria. Medical history data unexpectedly revealed that the majority of patients (87%) had undergone tonsillectomy for obstructive sleep apnea, which exposed an important co-morbidity that is not well described in the literature, but managing physicians should be made aware of. Fifteen of the 18 patients underwent molecular sequencing of PORCN to detect heterozygous or mosaic mutations. Where no mutation was detected, we performed exon-targeted chromosomal microarray to evaluate for large deletions of the PORCN gene region. We detected a pathogenic genotype in 14 of 15 patients, including one novel chromosomal deletion and four novel PORCN sequence variants. Here, we provide phenotypic summary analysis of 18 patients with focal dermal hypoplasia and propose clinical diagnostic criteria. (c) 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available