4.7 Article

Best (but oft-forgotten) practices: intention-to-treat, treatment adherence, and missing participant outcome data in the nutrition literature

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION
Volume 104, Issue 5, Pages 1197-1201

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.115.123315

Keywords

clinical trials; patient dropouts; randomization; adherence; intention to treat; missing outcome data; per protocol

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Among clinical trials of adequate size, randomization balances both known and unknown prognostic factors between trial arms, thus allowing an unbiased comparison of intervention and control. To preserve this benefit, all randomly assigned participants should be followed to study termination and analyzed in the arm to which they were allocated. There are 2 potential limitations in study implementation: 1) patients are nonadherent and continue with follow-up visits, or 2) patients are lost to follow-up and their outcome data are missing. Herein, we address these issues with an emphasis on binary outcomes, and discuss how authors of randomized trials should address issues of both noncompliance and missing data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available