4.7 Article

Exact quantification of cellular robustness in genome-scale metabolic networks

Journal

BIOINFORMATICS
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages 730-737

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv649

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Austrian BMWFW
  2. BMVIT
  3. SFG
  4. Standortagentur Tirol
  5. Government of Lower Austria
  6. ZIT through the Austrian FFG-COMET-Funding Program
  7. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research [FKZ 0316183D, FKZ: 031A180B]
  8. Federal State of Saxony-Anhalt (Research Center Dynamic Systems: Biosystems Engineering)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Motivation: Robustness, the ability of biological networks to uphold their functionality in spite of perturbations, is a key characteristic of all living systems. Although several theoretical approaches have been developed to formalize robustness, it still eludes an exact quantification. Here, we present a rigorous and quantitative approach for the structural robustness of metabolic networks by measuring their ability to tolerate random reaction (or gene) knockouts. Results: In analogy to reliability theory, based on an explicit consideration of all possible knockout sets, we exactly quantify the probability of failure for a given network function (e.g. growth). This measure can be computed if the network's minimal cut sets (MSCs) are known. We show that even in genome-scale metabolic networks the probability of (network) failure can be reliably estimated from MSCs with lowest cardinalities. We demonstrate the applicability of our theory by analyzing the structural robustness of multiple Enterobacteriaceae and Blattibacteriaceae and show a dramatically low structural robustness for the latter. We find that structural robustness develops from the ability to proliferate in multiple growth environments consistent with experimentally found knowledge. Conclusion: The probability of (network) failure provides thus a reliable and easily computable measure of structural robustness and redundancy in (genome-scale) metabolic networks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available