4.6 Article

High-Performance Polymer-Supported Extractants with Phosphonate Ligands for Scandium(III) Separation

Journal

AICHE JOURNAL
Volume 62, Issue 7, Pages 2479-2489

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/aic.15236

Keywords

polymer-supported extractants; scandium(III); adsorption mechanism; nickel laterite ore

Funding

  1. Key Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [KGZD-EW-201-1]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2012CBA01202]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of China [51174184]
  4. Science and Technology Planning Project of Jiangxi Province, China [20151BBE50012]
  5. Open Subject of Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China [RERU2015002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As the market demand for scandium has grown, a great deal of interest has been generated in its recovery. To substantially simplify the process and provide a green alternative for scandium separation, novel polymer-supported extractants containing di(2-ethylhexyl) phosphonate and bis(2,4,4-trimethylpentyl) phosphonate, [D201][DEHP] and [D201][C272] are proposed because they demonstrate improved adsorption capacity and selectivity toward scandium(III). Scandium(III) adsorption is significantly affected by the solution pH, with the maximum adsorption occurring at a pH of approximately 0.78. The batch adsorption data fit well with the Langmuir isotherm and pseudo-second-order kinetic models. A combination of the Fourier transform infrared and XPS spectra suggest that the complexation of oxygen atoms in phosphate groups with scandium(III) is the predominant adsorption mechanism. Additionally, the two resins were used to recover scandium from leaching liquor of nickel laterite ore. [D201][DEHP] exhibits unusual selectivity for scandium and low competitive behavior with other metals, thus increasing its market potential. (c) 2016 American Institute of Chemical Engineers

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available