4.7 Article

Explaining inter-annual variability of gross primary productivity from plant phenology and physiology

Journal

AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY
Volume 226, Issue -, Pages 246-256

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.06.010

Keywords

Daily maximum GPP; Start of growing season; End of growing season; Climate change; Drought

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Science
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91125018]
  3. National key Science and Technology Project Fund from the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) [2013BAB05B03]
  4. Research and Development Special Fund for Public Welfare Industry of the Ministry of Water Research in China [201301081]
  5. National Science Foundation EPSCoR research grant [IIA-1301789]
  6. China Scholarship Council
  7. Office Of The Director
  8. Office of Integrative Activities [1301789] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Climate variability influences both plant phenology and physiology, resulting in inter-annual variation in terrestrial gross primary productivity (GPP). However, it is still difficult to explain the inter-annual variability of GPP. In this study, we propose a Statistical Model of Integrated Phenology and Physiology (SMIPP) to explain the contributions of maximum daily GPP (GPP(max)), and start and end of the growing season (GS(start) and GS(end)) to the inter-annual variability of GPP observed at 27 sites across North America and Europe. Strong relationships are found between the anomalies of GS(start) and spring GPP (r = 0.82 +/- 0.10), GPP(max) and summer GPP (r = 0.90 +/- 0.14), and GS(end) and autumn GPP (r = 0.75 +/- 0.18) within each site. Partial correlation analysis further supports strong correlations of annual GPP with GS(start) (partial r value being 0.72 +/- 0.20), GPP(max) (0.87 +/- 0.15), and GS(end) (0.59 +/- 0.26), respectively. In addition, the three indicators are found independent from each other to influence annual GPP at most of the 27 sites. Overall, the site-calibrated SMIPP explains 90 +/- 11% of the annual GPP variability among the 27 sites. In general, GPP(max) contributes to annual GPP variation more than the two phenological indicators. These results indicate that the inter-annual variability of GPP can be effectively estimated using the three indicators. Investigating plant physiology, and spring and autumn phenology to environmental changes can improve the prediction of the annual GPP trajectory under future, climate change. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available