Social position and referral to rehabilitation among cancer patients
Published 2015 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Social position and referral to rehabilitation among cancer patients
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
ACTA ONCOLOGICA
Volume 54, Issue 5, Pages 720-726
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Online
2015-03-11
DOI
10.3109/0284186x.2014.997836
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Social inequality in cancer rehabilitation: A population-based cohort study
- (2013) Lise Vilstrup Holm et al. ACTA ONCOLOGICA
- 'Socioeconomic position and survival after cervical cancer: influence of cancer stage, comorbidity and smoking among Danish women diagnosed between 2005 and 2010
- (2013) E H Ibfelt et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
- Men's reflections on participating in cancer rehabilitation: a systematic review of qualitative studies 2000-2013
- (2013) C. Handberg et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE
- Socioeconomic Inequalities in Lung Cancer Treatment: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- (2013) Lynne F. Forrest et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Socio-demographic inequalities in stage of cancer diagnosis: evidence from patients with female breast, lung, colon, rectal, prostate, renal, bladder, melanoma, ovarian and endometrial cancer
- (2012) G. Lyratzopoulos et al. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
- Socioeconomic position, treatment and survival of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in Denmark – a nationwide study
- (2012) B L Frederiksen et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
- Socioeconomic Position and Stage of Cervical Cancer in Danish Women Diagnosed 2005 to 2009
- (2012) E. Ibfelt et al. CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION
- Socioeconomic position and surgery for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer: A population-based study in Denmark
- (2012) Laila Krgaard Starr et al. LUNG CANCER
- Who participates in a randomized trial of mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) after breast cancer? A study of factors associated with enrollment among Danish breast cancer patients
- (2012) Hanne Würtzen et al. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY
- Participation in cancer rehabilitation and unmet needs: a population-based cohort study
- (2012) Lise Vilstrup Holm et al. SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER
- Cancer patients’ needs for rehabilitation services
- (2011) Lene Thorsen et al. ACTA ONCOLOGICA
- Rehabilitation of cancer patients: Needed, but how?
- (2011) Susanne Oksbjerg Dalton et al. ACTA ONCOLOGICA
- Socioeconomic position, stage of lung cancer and time between referral and diagnosis in Denmark, 2001–2008
- (2011) S O Dalton et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
- Danish registers on personal labour market affiliation
- (2011) Flemming Petersson et al. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
- The Danish Cancer Registry
- (2011) Marianne Lundkjær Gjerstorff SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
- Danish education registers
- (2011) Vibeke M. Jensen et al. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
- Are different groups of cancer patients offered rehabilitation to the same extent? A report from the population-based study “The Cancer Patient’s World”
- (2011) Lone Ross et al. SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER
- Effect of Perceived Barriers to Symptom Management on Quality of Life in Older Breast Cancer Survivors
- (2009) Hyun-e Yeom et al. CANCER NURSING
- Social and psychological determinants of participation in internet-based cancer support groups
- (2009) Mette Terp Høybye et al. SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER
- Social inequality in incidence of and survival from cancer in a population-based study in Denmark, 1994–2003: Summary of findings
- (2008) Susanne Oksbjerg Dalton et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
- Research in Danish cancer rehabilitation: Social characteristics and late effects of cancer among participants in the FOCARE research project
- (2007) Mette terp Høybye et al. ACTA ONCOLOGICA
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started