4.7 Article

Observing the Ice-Covered Weddell Gyre With Profiling Floats: Position Uncertainties and Correlation Statistics

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS
Volume 123, Issue 11, Pages 8383-8410

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2017JC012990

Keywords

under ice floats; Weddell Sea circulation; temperature uncertainty; salinity uncertainty; air; sea flux uncertainty

Categories

Funding

  1. SOCCOM project under NSF [PLR-1425989]
  2. NOAA [NA17RJ1232, NA15OAR4320063]
  3. NSF [OPP1429342, OCE 1231803]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Argo-type profiling floats do not receive satellite positioning while under sea ice. Common practice is to approximate unknown positions by linearly interpolating latitude-longitude between known positions before and after ice cover, although it has been suggested that some improvement may be obtained by interpolating along contours of planetary-geostrophic potential vorticity. Profiles with linearly interpolated positions represent 16% of the Southern Ocean Argo data set; consequences arising from this approximation have not been quantified. Using three distinct data sets from the Weddell Gyre10-day satellite-tracked Argo floats, daily-tracked RAFOS-enabled floats, and a particle release simulation in the Southern Ocean State Estimatewe perform a data withholding experiment to assess position uncertainty in latitude-longitude and potential vorticity coordinates as a function of time since last fix. A spatial correlation analysis using the float data provides temperature and salinity uncertainty estimates as a function of distance error. Combining the spatial correlation scales and the position uncertainty, we estimate uncertainty in temperature and salinity as a function of duration of position loss. Maximum position uncertainty for interpolation during 8months without position data is 116148km for latitude-longitude and 92121km for potential vorticity coordinates. The estimated maximum uncertainty in local temperature and salinity over the entire 2,000-m profiles during 8months without position data is 0.66 degrees C and 0.15psu in the upper 300m and 0.16 degrees C and 0.01psu below 300m. Plain Language Summary Argo-type profiling floats do not receive GPS positioning while under sea ice. Current common practice is to approximate the unknown position by linearly interpolating between the known positions before and after ice cover. This linear interpolation is not the true path that these floats follow with under the ice. What is the uncertainty of this linear approximation? Float position and velocity decorrelate with timemeaning the linear approximation of position tends to be worse as time increases. In our paper, we address the question of measurement uncertainty as a function of time by breaking the problem into two pieces: the position uncertainty as a function of time and the measurement uncertainty as a function of position. Combining these statistics, we estimate uncertainty as a function of time of position loss for temperature and salinity as well as surface fluxes derived from the Southern Ocean State Estimate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available