4.5 Article

Identification of genes and analysis of prognostic values in nonsmoking females with non-small cell lung carcinoma by bioinformatics analyses

Journal

CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages 4287-4295

Publisher

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S174409

Keywords

non-small cell lung carcinoma; NSCLC; nonsmoking females; GEO2R; prognostic biomarkers; Kaplan-Meier plotter

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: This study was performed to identify disease-related genes and analyze prognostic values in nonsmoking females with non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). Materials and methods: Gene expression profile GSE19804 was downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database and analyzed by using GEO2R. Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes were used for the functional and pathway enrichment analysis. Then, the Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes, Cytoscape, and Molecular Complex Detection were used to construct the protein-protein interaction (PPI) network and identify hub genes. Finally, the Kaplan-Meier plotter online tool was used for the overall survival analysis of hub genes. Results: A cohort of 699 differentially expressed genes was screened, and they were mainly enriched in the terms of ECM-receptor interaction, focal adhesion, and cell adhesion molecules. A PPI network was constructed, and 15 hub genes were identified base on the subset of PPI network. Then, two significant modules were detected and several genes were found to be associated with the cell cycle pathway. Finally, nine hub genes' (UBE2C, DLGAP5, TPX2, CCNB2, BIRC5, KIF20A, TOP2A, GNG11, and ANXA1) expressions were found to be associated with the prognosis of the patients. Conclusion: Overall, we propose that the cell cycle pathway may play an important role in nonsmoking females with NSCLC and the nine hub genes may be further explored as potential targets for NSCLC diagnosis and treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available