4.7 Article

Quantum computation is the unique reversible circuit model for which bits are balls

Journal

NPJ QUANTUM INFORMATION
Volume 5, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41534-018-0123-x

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) through the Doctoral Programme CoQuS [W1210]
  2. John Templeton Foundation
  3. Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics
  4. Government of Canada through the Department of Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada
  5. Province of Ontario through the Ministry of Research, Innovation and Science
  6. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [W1210] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The computational efficiency of quantum mechanics can be characterized in terms of the qubit circuit model, which is defined by a few simple properties: each computational gate is a reversible transformation in a connected matrix group; single wires carry quantum bits, i. e. states of a three-dimensional Bloch ball; states on two or more wires are uniquely determined by local measurement statistics and their correlations. In this paper, we ask whether other types of computation are possible if we relax one of those characteristics (and keep all others), namely, if we allow wires to be described by d-dimensional Bloch balls, where d is different from three. Theories of this kind have previously been proposed as possible generalizations of quantum physics, and it has been conjectured that some of them allow for interesting multipartite reversible transformations that cannot be realized within quantum theory. However, here we show that all such potential beyond-quantum models of computation are trivial: if d is not three, then the set of reversible transformations consists entirely of single-bit gates, and not even classical computation is possible. In this sense, qubit quantum computation is an island in theoryspace.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available