4.6 Review

Chemopreventive effects of aspirin at a glance

Journal

BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-REVIEWS ON CANCER
Volume 1855, Issue 2, Pages 254-263

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2015.03.007

Keywords

Aspirin; Cancer; Chemoprevention; Cyclooxygenase

Funding

  1. Chinese Government Scholarship [CSC 2013422002]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81372853, 81472447]
  3. Liaoning Provincial Climbing Scholars Supporting Program of China
  4. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University [IRT13049]
  5. Liaoning Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [502537]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Experimental, epidemiological, and clinical data from the last two decades have each supported the hypothesis that aspirin possesses anticancer properties, and that its use may also reduce the lifetime probability of developing or dying from a number of cancers. Aspirin's ability to act on multiple key metabolic and signaling pathways via inhibition of the cyclooxygenase (COX) enzyme, as well as through COX-independent mechanisms, makes it particularly relevant in the fight against cancer. A growing body of evidence indicates that aspirin may not only reduce cancer risk, but also prevent metastasis and angiogenesis while slowing the rate of mutation-inducing DNA damage. These emerging benefits of aspirin are offset to some extent by the known risks of treatment, such as cardiovascular events and gastrointestinal bleeding. However, it has been shown that pre-treatment risk assessment of individual patients and the use of proton pump inhibitors or Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy concomitantly with aspirin treatment can reduce these potential risks. Thus, the significant benefits of aspirin treatment, coupled with recent data concerning its risks, may prove to tip the balance in favor of aspirin use in cancer prevention. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available