4.3 Article

The Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Substantial Clinical Benefit in the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures of Patients Undergoing Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation in the Knee

Journal

CARTILAGE
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages 42-50

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1947603518812552

Keywords

minimal clinically important difference; substantial clinical benefit; Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score; International Knee Documentation Committee; Lysholm score; Short Form 12; osteochondral allograft transplantation

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Our study aimed to determine the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) associated with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after osteochondral allograft transplantation (OCA). The MCID for KOOS pain was 16.7, for KOOS sports/recreation was 25, and for IKDC was 9.8. The SCB for various PROMs ranged from 10.7 to 31.3, providing valuable insights for clinicians and researchers in evaluating treatment outcomes.
Objective Little is known regarding the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) with regard to the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form, Lysholm score, and Short Form 12 (SF-12) score of patients who undergo osteochondral allograft transplantation (OCA). We aimed to determine the MCID and SCB associated with those patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after OCA. Design We analyzed the data of 86 consecutive patients who underwent OCA and who completed satisfaction surveys at a minimum of 1 year postoperatively and had at least one repeated PROM. MCID was determined using an anchor-based method: the optimal cutoff point for receiver operative characteristic (ROC) curves. If an anchor-based method was inapplicable, distribution-based methods were employed. SCB was determined using ROC curve analysis. Results Based on the ROC curve analysis, MCID was 16.7 for KOOS pain, 25 for KOOS sports/recreation, and 9.8 for IKDC. SCB was 27.7 for KOOS pain, 10.7 for KOOS symptom, 30 for KOOS sports/recreation, 31.3 for KOOS quality of life, 26.9 for IKDC, 25 for Lysholm, and 12.1 for SF-12 physical component summary. No significant association was noted between SCB achievement and the baseline patient factors and baseline PROMs. Conclusion We demonstrated the MCIDs and SCBs of several PROMs in patients undergoing OCA. These results will aid the interpretation of the effect of treatment and clinical trial settings. Moreover, the SCBs will help surgeons in the counseling of patients, where patients expect optimal results rather than minimal improvement.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available