4.5 Article

Heat susceptibility of grain filling in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) linked with rapid chlorophyll loss during a 3-day heat treatment

Journal

ACTA PHYSIOLOGIAE PLANTARUM
Volume 38, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11738-016-2208-5

Keywords

Heat tolerance; Senescence; Stay-green; Chlorophyll content; Wheat

Categories

Funding

  1. Grains Research and Development Corporation (GRDC) [UA00123]
  2. Australian Centre for Plant Functional Genomics (ACPFG)
  3. GRDC
  4. Government of South Australia
  5. University of Adelaide
  6. Australian Research Council
  7. University of South Australia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Brief heat events (1-3 days, >30 degrees C) commonly reduce wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grain size and consequently yield. To identify mechanisms of tolerance to such short heat events, 36 wheat genotypes were treated under day/night temperatures of 37 degrees C/27 degrees C for 3-days in a growth chamber, at 10 days after anthesis, and a range of developmental, chlorophyll and yield-related traits monitored. The degree of flag leaf chlorophyll loss during the treatment was the variable that showed the highest correlation to grain weight loss (r = 0.63; p< 0.001), identifying chlorophyll stability during this brief period as a potential determinant or indicator of grain weight stability under heat. Variables summarizing the combined during- and post-heat chlorophyll losses showed similar or lower correlations with heat tolerance of grain filling, despite the fact that genotypes varied in their ability to resume normal chlorophyll loss rates after the heat treatment. Additionally, heat tolerance of grain size showed no correlation with grain filling duration or traits relating to utilization of stem carbon reserves under heat stress. Measurement of chlorophyll loss over a forecasted heat wave was thereby identified as a potential basis for developing tools to help breeders select heat tolerant genotypes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available