4.3 Article

Callibrachion and Datheosaurus, two historical and previously mistaken basal caseasaurian synapsids from Europe

Journal

ACTA PALAEONTOLOGICA POLONICA
Volume 61, Issue 3, Pages 597-616

Publisher

INST PALEOBIOLOGII PAN
DOI: 10.4202/app.00221.2015

Keywords

Synapsida; Caseasauria; Carboniferous; Permian; Autun Basin; France; Intra-Sudetic Basin; Poland

Categories

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [SCHN 408/20-1]
  2. Sofja Kovalevskaja Award - Alexander von Humboldt Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study represents a re-investigation of two historical fossil discoveries, Callibrachion gaudryi (Artinskian of France) and Datheosaurus macrourus (Gzhelian of Poland), that were originally classified as haptodontine-grade sphenaco-dontians and have been lately treated as nomina dubia. Both taxa are here identified as basal caseasaurs based on their overall proportions as well as dental and osteological characteristics that differentiate them from any other major synapsid subclade. As a result of poor preservation, no distinct autapomorphies can be recognized. However, our detailed investigations of the virtually complete skeletons in the light of recent progress in basal synapsid research allow a novel interpretation of their phylogenetic positions. Datheosaurus might represent an eothyridid or basal caseid. Callibrachion shares some similarities with the more derived North American genus Casea. These new observations on Datheosaurus and Callibrachion provide new insights into the early diversification of caseasaurs, reflecting an evolutionary stage that lacks spatulate teeth and broadened phalanges that are typical for other caseid species. Along with Eocasea, the former ghost lineage to the Late Pennsylvanian origin of Caseasauria is further closed. For the first time, the presence of basal caseasaurs in Europe is documented.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available