4.4 Article

User perceptions of avatar-based patient monitoring: a mixed qualitative and quantitative study

Journal

BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY
Volume 18, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12871-018-0650-1

Keywords

Computer-assisted; Diagnosis; Patient monitoring; Situation awareness; Qualitative research

Categories

Funding

  1. Institute of Anaesthesiology
  2. University Hospital Zurich
  3. University of Zurich [UZ16/288POC]
  4. University of Zurich

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundA new patient monitoring technology called Visual Patient, which transforms numerical and waveform data into a virtual model (an avatar) of the monitored patient, has been shown to improve the perception of vital signs compared to conventional patient monitoring. In order to gain a deeper understanding of the opinions of potential future users regarding the new technology, we have analyzed the answers of two large groups of anesthetists using two different study methods.MethodsFirst, we carried out a qualitative analysis guided by the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research checklist. For this analysis, we interviewed 128 anesthesiologists, asking: Where do you see advantages in Visual Patient monitoring? and afterward identified major and minor themes in their answers. In a second study, an online survey with 38 anesthesiologists at two different institutions, we added a quantitative part in which anesthesiologists rated statements based on the themes identified in the prior analysis on an ordinal rating scale.ResultsWe identified four high-level themes: quick situation recognition, intuitiveness, unique design characteristics, and potential future uses, and eight subthemes.The quantitative questions raised for each major theme were: 1. The Visual Patient technology enabled me to get a quick overview of the situation. (63% of the participants agreed or very much agreed to this statement). 2. I found the Visual Patient technology to be intuitive and easy to learn. (82% agreed or very much agreed to this statement). 3. The visual design features of the Visual Patient technology (e.g., the avatar representation) are not helpful for patient monitoring. (11% agreed to this statement). 4. I think the Visual Patient technology might be helpful for non-monitor experts (e.g., surgeons) in the healthcare system. (53% of the participants agreed or strongly agreed).ConclusionThis mixed method study provides evidence that the included anesthesiologists considered the new avatar-based technology to be intuitive and easy to learn and that the technology enabled them to get an overview of the situation quickly. Only a few users considered the avatar presentation to be unhelpful for patient monitoring and about half think it might be useful for non-experts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available