4.4 Article

Terrestrial isopods associated with shallow underground of forested scree slopes in the Western Carpathians (Slovakia)

Journal

ZOOKEYS
Volume -, Issue 801, Pages 323-335

Publisher

PENSOFT PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.801.24113

Keywords

depth distribution; MSS; Oniscidea; shallow subterranean habitat; specks diversity; subterranean traps

Categories

Funding

  1. Slovak Grant Agency VEGA [APVV-17-0477]
  2. Slovak Research and Development Agency
  3. [1/0199/14]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The shallow underground of forested scree slopes represents a little-studied subterranean biotope. In this paper, species diversity and depth distribution of terrestrial isopod communities studied in the depth profile (5-95 cm from the surface) of eight forested scree slopes in the Western Carpathians (Slovakia) is discussed. The southern edge of the Western Carpathians where the study sites are located represents the northernmost limit of distribution of obligate subterranean fauna in Europe. The sites differ from each other in type of bedrock, forest composition, slope aspect, and altitude. To sample isopods, a set of three subterranean pitfall traps consisting of a plastic cylinder (empty set 110 mm) and ten plastic cups was buried in each studied scree slope. In total, 252 isopods belonging to eleven species were sampled (1-5 species per site). Of the species found, the blind and depigmented Mesoniscus granter was the sole species closely associated with deeper parts of the depth profile and was present in most of the sites studied. Another ten species were represented by a small number of individuals and their occurrence deeper in the scree slope profile was rather accidental. A comparison between winter and summer periods indicates apparent differences in seasonal activities of isopods. Ethylene glycol seems to be more appropriate fixative solution for trapping isopods than formaldehyde.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available