Microsurgical unilateral laminotomy for decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: long-term results and predictive factors
Published 2016 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Microsurgical unilateral laminotomy for decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: long-term results and predictive factors
Authors
Keywords
lumbar spinal stenosis, Microsurgical unilateral decompression, Reoperation, Long-term outcome, Predictors
Journal
ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA
Volume 158, Issue 6, Pages 1103-1113
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2016-04-15
DOI
10.1007/s00701-016-2804-6
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Does daily tobacco smoking affect outcomes after microdecompression for degenerative central lumbar spinal stenosis? – A multicenter observational registry-based study
- (2015) Sasha Gulati et al. ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA
- Minimally invasive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with and without preoperative spondylolisthesis: clinical outcome and reoperation rates
- (2015) Marjan Alimi et al. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE
- Prognostic Factors for Surgical Outcomes Including Preoperative Total Knee Replacement and Knee Osteoarthritis Status in Female Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
- (2015) Byung Ho Lee et al. JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES
- Long-term Outcomes of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
- (2015) Jon D. Lurie et al. SPINE
- Comparing Cost-effectiveness of X-Stop With Minimally Invasive Decompression in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
- (2015) Greger Lønne et al. SPINE
- Minimally Invasive Decompression Versus X-Stop in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
- (2015) Greger Lønne et al. SPINE
- The Risk of Getting Worse: Predictors of Deterioration After Decompressive Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Multicenter Observational Study
- (2015) Ulf S. Nerland et al. World Neurosurgery
- Does Obesity Affect Outcomes After Decompressive Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis? A Multicenter, Observational, Registry-Based Study
- (2015) Charalampis Giannadakis et al. World Neurosurgery
- Minimally invasive decompression versus open laminectomy for central stenosis of the lumbar spine: pragmatic comparative effectiveness study
- (2015) U. S. Nerland et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Minimally invasive decompression versus open laminectomy for central stenosis of the lumbar spine: pragmatic comparative effectiveness study
- (2015) U. S. Nerland et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Comparative Analysis of Inpatient and Outpatient Interspinous Process Device Placement for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
- (2015) Alicia Ortega et al. Journal of Neurological Surgery Part A-Central European Neurosurgery
- Secular Changes of Spinal Canal Dimensions in Western Switzerland
- (2014) Constantin Schizas et al. SPINE
- Radiographic predictors of delayed instability following decompression without fusion for degenerative Grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis
- (2013) Claire Blumenthal et al. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE
- Decompression Only Versus Fusion Surgery for Lumbar Stenosis in Elderly Patients Over 75 Years Old: Which is Reasonable?
- (2013) Chang-Hyun LEE et al. NEUROLOGIA MEDICO-CHIRURGICA
- Preoperative Predictors for Good Postoperative Satisfaction and Functional Outcome in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Surgery — A Prospective Observational Study with a Two-Year Follow-up
- (2013) T. Aalto et al. Scandinavian Journal of Surgery
- Socioeconomic and Physical Characteristics of Individuals With Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
- (2013) Janan Abbas et al. SPINE
- Interspinous Spacers Compared With Decompression or Fusion for Lumbar Stenosis
- (2013) Richard A. Deyo et al. SPINE
- Reoperation rate after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis without spondylolisthesis: a nationwide cohort study
- (2013) Chi Heon Kim et al. Spine Journal
- Does fusion improve the outcome after decompressive surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis?
- (2013) P. Försth et al. Bone & Joint Journal
- Prognostic factors in lumbar spinal stenosis surgery
- (2012) Freyr G Sigmundsson et al. Acta Orthopaedica
- The effectiveness of land based exercise compared to decompressive surgery in the management of lumbar spinal-canal stenosis: a systematic review
- (2012) Mark S Jarrett et al. BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS
- Prediction of long-term clinical outcome in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis
- (2012) B. Micankova Adamova et al. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL
- Risk for Adjacent Segment and Same Segment Reoperation After Surgery for Lumbar Stenosis
- (2012) Kris Radcliff et al. SPINE
- SPORT: Does Incidental Durotomy Affect Long-term Outcomes in Cases of Spinal Stenosis?
- (2011) Atman Desai et al. NEUROSURGERY
- Smokers Show Less Improvement Than Nonsmokers Two Years after Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
- (2011) Bengt Sandén et al. SPINE
- Surgery Versus Conservative Treatment for Symptomatic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
- (2011) Francisco M. Kovacs et al. SPINE
- Predictive factors influencing clinical outcome with operative management of lumbar spinal stenosis
- (2011) Aravind Athiviraham et al. Spine Journal
- Morbidity and mortality in the surgical treatment of 10,329 adults with degenerative lumbar stenosis
- (2010) Kai-Ming G. Fu et al. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE
- Success and Failure of Minimally Invasive Decompression for Focal Lumbar Spinal Stenosis in Patients With and Without Deformity
- (2010) Michael O. Kelleher et al. SPINE
- Clinical Outcome of Microsurgical Bilateral Decompression via Unilateral Approach for Lumbar Canal Stenosis
- (2010) Hiromitsu Toyoda et al. SPINE
- Comparison of Techniques for Decompressive Lumbar Laminectomy: the Minimally Invasive versus the “Classic” Open Approach
- (2008) M. Rahman et al. MINIMALLY INVASIVE NEUROSURGERY
- Surgical versus Nonsurgical Therapy for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
- (2008) James N. Weinstein et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationPublish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn More