4.5 Article

Do the best papers have the highest probability of being cited?

Journal

SCIENTOMETRICS
Volume 118, Issue 3, Pages 885-890

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-019-03008-z

Keywords

Scholars; Imperfect attention; Article quality; Journal citation impact; Paper salience; Competitive forces

Funding

  1. Spanish Board for Science, Technology, and Innovation [TIN2017-85542-P]
  2. European FEDER funds

Ask authors/readers for more resources

If scholars suffer from imperfect attention, they will not always cite the best paper on a particular topic. The most chosen scholarly works may merely be the most cited ones, not the best articles. Here, a paper is chosen when someone cites it, after paying attention to it. Manuscripts' authors might affect preferences by using salience to influence what scholars pay attention to. In our work, paying attention to an article is when someone reads it. For instance, authors can submit the research works to top-tier journals in the discipline, and thus enter the salient papers of the readers. However, do such competitive forces tend to correct choice errors caused by reader's imperfect attention? In this short communication, we study about how the competition between research works for publication may ensure that the best paper is the one having the highest probability to be cited. According to the model, the best papers are the ones published in the journal with the highest citation impact. Therefore, these papers are also the ones that have the highest probability to attract attention and the highest probability of being cited.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

Article Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications

Can a paid model for peer review be sustainable when the author can decide whether to pay or not?

J. A. Garcia, Rosa Rodriguez-Sanchez, J. Fdez-Valdivia

Summary: This paper examines the impact of incentives on review quality by paying reviewers and the influence of authors' payment decisions in the peer review process. The study finds that under a hybrid peer review model where authors decide whether to pay, the price and quality of optional speedy peer review are always higher than under the benchmark scenario of paid peer-reviewing.

SCIENTOMETRICS (2022)

Article Information Science & Library Science

Fraud, specialization, and efficiency in peer review

J. A. Garcia, Rosa Rodriguez-Sanchez, J. Fdez-Valdivia

Summary: Reviewers may be influenced by cognitive biases when reviewing, leading to incorrect editorial decisions for authors. A high fraud cost may result in an efficient equilibrium in peer review processes. Specialization equilibrium may occur when authors choose top journals with truthful editorial decisions.

RESEARCH EVALUATION (2022)

Article Computer Science, Information Systems

Finding answers to COVID-19-specific questions: An information retrieval system based on latent keywords and adapted TF-IDF

Jorge Chamorro-Padial, Francisco-Javier Rodrigo-Gines, Rosa Rodriguez-Sanchez

Summary: The scientific community has responded to the COVID-19 outbreak with a high number of literary works, utilizing an Information Retrieval System that uses latent information to select relevant works related to specific concepts. Through human validation and evaluation strategies, the system has shown good performance with precision and accuracy exceeding specified thresholds.

JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE (2022)

Article Medical Ethics

What is the sensitivity and specificity of the peer review process?

Jose A. Garcia, Jorge Chamorro-Padial, Rosa Rodriguez-Sanchez, J. Fdez-Valdivia

Summary: This paper introduces the concepts of sensitivity and specificity to describe the accuracy of the peer review process. It explains how sensitivity measures the ability to correctly accept manuscripts that meet the required standards, and how specificity measures the ability to correctly reject manuscripts that do not meet those standards. The paper highlights the importance of sensitivity and specificity in improving the ethical conduct and validity of peer review processes.

ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-POLICIES AND QUALITY ASSURANCE (2022)

Review Computer Science, Information Systems

The cross-subsidy and buy-one-give-one models of compensated peer review: A comparative study for mission-driven journals

Jose A. Garcia, Rosa Maria Rodriguez-Sanchez, J. Fdez-Valdivia

Summary: This article examines two models of compensated peer review, cross-subsidy and buy-one-give-one, and finds that the buy-one-give-one scenario provides a higher total sum of financial and social gain when the mission-driven journals are highly socially responsible or when the social gap between high-income and low-income authors is large enough.

JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE (2022)

Article Computer Science, Information Systems

A formal study of co-opetition in scholarly publishing

Jose A. Garcia, Rosa Rodriguez-Sanchez, J. Fdez-Valdivia

Summary: In this article, the authors study a cooperative peer-review scenario in scholarly publishing, where peer-reviewed journals cooperate in the necessary investment for the peer-review system. The findings show that by sharing the cost, the journals can offer a higher review quality than they would be able to achieve individually. They also identify the conditions under which the competing journals using cooperative peer review can increase their expected quality levels, standards for accepting articles, and peer-review quality.

JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE (2022)

Article Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence

Corner Centrality of Nodes in Multilayer Networks: A Case Study in the Network Analysis of Keywords

Rosa Maria Rodriguez-Sanchez, Jorge Chamorro-Padial

Summary: This paper presents a new method for measuring node centrality in a multilayer network. The method integrates the importance assigned to each node by different layers, resulting in a centrality score called the corner centrality. The proposed algorithm has been tested with different configurations of multilayer networks and has shown excellent results. It is also computationally efficient and has low memory requirements.

ALGORITHMS (2022)

Article Computer Science, Information Systems

The relevance of title, abstract, and keywords for scientific paper quality and potential impact

Jorge Chamorro-Padial, Rosa Rodriguez-Sanchez

Summary: Authors, editors, and reviewers need to accurately perceive the quality of a manuscript in order to improve their skills and prevent errors. This paper compared the author's perception of a manuscript's quality with its actual impact and analyzed the uncertainty in this perception. A website was launched to help researchers improve their understanding of manuscript quality, and the experiment showed that the Abstract, Title, and Keywords were sufficient for evaluating a manuscript in less than a minute.

MULTIMEDIA TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS (2023)

Article Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence

Attention-Survival Score: A Metric to Choose Better Keywords and Improve Visibility of Information

Jorge Chamorro-Padial, Rosa Rodriguez-Sanchez

Summary: This paper proposes a method for authors to choose alternative keywords that can increase the visibility of their papers. These alternative keywords should have popularity in the scientific community and less competition. The authors developed an algorithm based on attention and survival scores to recommend alternative keywords. The use of ontologies ensures the semantic relationship between alternative and input keywords.

ALGORITHMS (2023)

No Data Available