4.7 Article

Artificial light at night does not affect telomere shortening in a developing free-living songbird: A field experiment Artificial light at night and telomere dynamics

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 662, Issue -, Pages 266-275

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.469

Keywords

Artificial light at night; Developmental stress; Telomeres; Nitric oxide; Body condition; Parts major

Funding

  1. University of Antwerp
  2. FWO Flanders
  3. European Commission (Marie Sklodowska-Curie fellowship) [799667]
  4. European Commission (FWO) [1.1.044.15N, 1.1.044.17N, 1.2I35.17N, G0A3615N, G052117N]
  5. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [799667] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Artificial light at night (ALAN) is an increasingly pervasive anthropogenic disturbance factor. ALAN can seriously disrupt physiological systems that follow circadian rhythms, and may be particularly influential early in life, when developmental trajectories are sensitive to stressful conditions. Using great tits (Paras major) as a model species, we experimentally examined how ALAN affects physiological stress in developing nestlings. We used a repeated-measure design to assess effects of ALAN on telomere shortening, body mass, tarsus length and body condition. Telomeres are repetitive nucleotide sequences that protect chromosomes from damage and malfunction. Early-life telomere shortening can be accelerated by environmental stressors, and has been linked to later life declines in survival and reproduction. We also assayed nitric oxide, as an additional metric of physiological stress, and determined fledging success. Change in body condition between day 8 and 15 differed according to treatment. Nestlings exposed to ALAN displayed a trend towards a decline in condition, whereas control nestlings displayed a trend towards increased condition. This pattern was driven by a greater increase in tarsus length relative to mass in nestlings exposed to ALAN. Nestlings in poorer condition and nestlings that were smaller than their nest mates had shorter telomeres. However, exposure to ALAN was unrelated to telomere shortening, and also had no effect on nitric oxide concentrations or fledging success. Thus, exposure to ALAN may not have led to sufficient stress to induce telomere shortening. Indeed, plasticity in other physiological systems could allow nestlings to maintain telomere length despite moderate stress. Alternatively, the cascade of physiological and behavioral responses associated with light exposure may have no net effect on telomere dynamics. (C) 2019 Elsevier BA,. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available